Subject-To vs Wraparound Mortgage in Utah: Which Is Easier to Refinance?
Subject-to and wraparound deals both leave the seller's loan in place and both carry due-on-sale risk. Here is how title, payments, security, and the refinance exit compare in Utah.
Informational onlyThis page is general information about Utah law, not legal advice for your situation. Reading it doesn't create an attorney-client relationship. Read the disclaimer.
Neither subject-to nor a wraparound mortgage is easy to refinance; both require the buyer to qualify for a new loan. Both also leave the seller's loan in place, so the due-on-sale clause is live in both. The real differences are who holds a recorded lien, who pays whom, and how clean the payoff is.
What is the difference between subject-to and a wraparound mortgage?
In a subject-to deal, the buyer takes title and makes the payments on the seller's existing loan. In a wraparound, the buyer signs a new, larger note to the seller, and the seller keeps paying the old loan.
Take a Lehi home selling for $400,000. The seller's original loan was $320,000 at 3.25%. Its balance is now $260,000, and the payment is $1,392.66 a month.
Subject-to. The buyer pays the seller some cash, say $20,000, and takes a deed. The loan stays in the seller's name. The buyer starts making the $1,392.66 payment. The seller has no new note and, usually, no recorded lien.
Wraparound. The buyer pays $40,000 down and signs a $360,000 note at 6.75% over 30 years. The payment is $2,334.95 a month. The note is secured by an all-inclusive trust deed on the home. The seller keeps paying the $1,392.66 underlying payment and keeps the difference, a spread of just under one thousand dollars a month.
In both deals, the seller stays personally liable on the $260,000 loan. In both, the lender can call it. Federal law lets lenders enforce due-on-sale clauses (12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3(b)(1)). A wrap and a subject-to transfer are not on the exemption list (12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3(d)).
How do subject-to and a wrap compare side by side?
The biggest difference is the seller's security. In a wrap, the seller holds a note and a recorded trust deed. In a typical subject-to deal, the seller holds a promise and a hope. The table below reflects typical structures; documents vary.
| Question | Subject-to | Wraparound (AITD) |
|---|---|---|
| Who holds title after closing? | The buyer, by deed | The buyer, by deed |
| Whose loan is it? | Still the seller's, in the seller's name | Still the seller's, wrapped inside the buyer's new note |
| Who pays whom? | Buyer pays the seller's lender, often directly | Buyer pays the seller or a servicer; the seller's lender is paid from that |
| What gets recorded? | The deed to the buyer | The deed, plus the all-inclusive trust deed securing the buyer's note |
| What secures the seller? | Often nothing recorded, unless the documents create it | A recorded all-inclusive trust deed, junior to the underlying loan in practice |
| How does the refinance exit work? | Buyer's new loan pays off the seller's old loan | Buyer's new loan pays off the wrap note; the underlying loan is paid from it |
| What happens if the buyer stops paying? | The seller's loan goes delinquent on the seller's credit | The seller can foreclose the all-inclusive trust deed, and still owes the underlying loan |
Recording matters for the seller. Recording a document gives constructive notice to everyone (Utah Code § 57-3-102). An unrecorded document is void against a later good-faith purchaser who records first (Utah Code § 57-3-103). A seller with nothing recorded has little to stand on if the buyer sells or borrows against the house.
Which is easier to refinance, subject-to or a wraparound?
Neither structure makes a refinance easy. In both, the buyer must qualify for a new bank loan on credit, income, and equity. A wrap usually gives a cleaner payoff picture, because there is one note balance and a payment record.
This is practice guidance, not a lender's promise. Lenders set their own rules on how long the buyer must own the home and how much equity is needed. Those rules change. The buyer should talk to a loan officer before the deal closes, not after.
Here is how the refinance tends to look in each structure.
Subject-to refinance. The buyer is on title, but the loan is in the seller's name. The new lender pays off the seller's loan. The buyer's payment history is on someone else's loan, which the buyer may need to document separately. Any equity the seller left in the deal was usually settled at closing, or not at all.
Wraparound refinance. The buyer is on title and owes the seller a note. The new lender pays off the wrap note balance. The seller uses that money to pay off the underlying loan and keeps the rest. In the example, after 60 payments the buyer owes about $337,953 on the $360,000 note. A servicer's records show five years of on-time payments on the buyer's own note.
If the lender calls the underlying loan first, the state addendum helps on a wrap. The buyer's payoff is credited to the note's principal (Seller Financing Addendum § 5). The buyer doesn't pay twice.
For the buyer's side of the exit, see refinancing out of seller financing.
What does the seller risk in a subject-to deal?
The seller risks their credit, their liability on the loan, and the house, often with no recorded security. If the buyer stops paying, the missed payments land on the seller's credit report. The seller already deeded the home away.
A subject-to seller should ask hard questions. Who makes the monthly payment, and how will I see proof? Who holds the hazard insurance, and am I still covered? What happens if the buyer stops paying in month 14? What happens if the lender calls the loan? If the answers are only verbal, the seller is carrying risk with nothing to show for it.
There is no state-approved subject-to form in Utah. The current approved forms list has none (Utah Admin. Code R162-2f-401f). Every subject-to deal runs on custom documents. Those documents should protect the seller, not just the buyer. If a wholesaler pitched you a subject-to deal, read our guide for sellers pitched a subject-to first.
"Legally allowed to" and "actually goes well" aren't always the same thing. A subject-to deal can be lawful between buyer and seller and still go badly for the seller.
What does the seller risk in a wraparound deal?
The seller risks paying the underlying loan when the buyer doesn't, and a called loan they can't pay off. The seller does hold a recorded lien, so there is a remedy if the buyer defaults. That remedy takes time and money.
The addendum lets the parties choose a note and all-inclusive deed of trust (Seller Financing Addendum § 1). The state has approved forms titled All Inclusive Trust Deed (All Inclusive Trust Deed (state-approved form, Oct. 1, 1983)) and All Inclusive Promissory Note Secured by All Inclusive Trust Deed (All Inclusive Promissory Note Secured by All Inclusive Trust Deed (state-approved form, Oct. 1, 1983)), both dated October 1, 1983. No Utah statute specifically regulates wraparound financing (Utah Code Title 57, Chapter 1). The deal lives or dies on the documents.
If the buyer defaults, the seller can foreclose the all-inclusive trust deed. Only a Utah attorney or a licensed Utah title company may exercise the power of sale (Utah Code § 57-1-21). Meanwhile, the seller keeps paying the underlying loan to protect everyone's position. Model your spread and your exposure with the wrap spread calculator.
How do you manage the due-on-sale risk in either structure?
Plan for a called loan before closing, in writing. The steps below are practice guidance. They don't remove the risk. They make it survivable.
- Use a third-party servicer. The servicer collects from the buyer and pays the underlying lender first. Both sides get records. See third-party note servicing.
- Hold reserves. Keep cash to cover several underlying payments, or part of a payoff.
- Keep insurance in force. Confirm who holds the hazard policy and how the lender and each party are named. Ask the insurance agent directly.
- Set an exit date. Agree on when the buyer will refinance, and what happens if the buyer can't.
- Write the acceleration plan. Say who does what, and by when, if the lender calls the loan.
- Disclose it in writing. A licensee must disclose the possible due-on-sale clause and its consequences in writing before a binding agreement (Utah Admin. Code R162-2f-401a(6)(d)). Unrepresented parties should do the same.
For the full called-loan scenario, read what happens if the lender calls the due-on-sale clause.
Which structure should you choose in Utah?
For a seller, a wrap usually offers more protection, because the seller holds a recorded lien and a note. For a buyer, the right answer depends on price, rate, and the exit plan. Either way, the due-on-sale risk is the same.
Choose based on the whole deal, not the label. Compare the seller's security, the payment flow, the exit, and what happens on a bad day. The which-instrument tool walks through the choices. Our investor page and the guide to seller financing with a mortgage go deeper.
What Greg would tell you
"Subject-to and a wrap carry the same due-on-sale risk; what differs is how well the seller is protected when something goes wrong. If I'm the seller, I want a recorded lien, a servicer, and a written exit date. If a deal can't offer those, I'd want to know why before I sign the deed."
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between subject-to and a wraparound mortgage?
In subject-to, the buyer takes title and pays the seller's existing loan. In a wrap, the buyer pays the seller on a new, larger note, and the seller keeps paying the old loan.
Which is easier to refinance, subject-to or a wrap?
Neither is easy; both depend on the buyer qualifying for a new loan. A clean, documented payment history and real equity matter more than the label on the deal.
Is a subject-to deal exempt from the due-on-sale clause?
No, a subject-to transfer is not on the federal exemption list. Neither is a wrap or a contract for deed.
Is there a state-approved subject-to form in Utah?
No, the current state-approved forms list has no subject-to form. The state does have All Inclusive Trust Deed and All Inclusive Note forms from 1983.
As the seller, how do I protect myself in a subject-to deal?
Get the protection in writing before you deed the house. That means a servicer, proof of insurance, a recorded security interest where possible, and a firm exit date.
This site is for general information about Utah law and is not legal advice. Using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every transaction is different — talk to an attorney about yours. Attorney advertising.
Related reading · For investors
- 01
A Wholesaler Pitched You a Sub-To. Read This First.
A calm, seller-side checklist for Utah homeowners offered a subject-to deal: the due-on-sale clause, your credit, and what to ask before you sign. - 02
Can I Seller-Finance My Utah Home If I Still Have a Mortgage?
Yes, through a wrap or all-inclusive trust deed, but the due-on-sale clause stays with you. The risks, the math, and the safeguards, from a Utah attorney with a flat fee. - 03
Contract for Deed in Utah: What the Buyer Gives Up and What the Seller Gets
A Utah attorney's plain-English guide to contracts for deed: forfeiture versus foreclosure, the court cases that limit forfeiture, and how buyers protect themselves.
Primary sources
- 12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3(b)(1)
- 12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3(d)
- Seller Financing Addendum § 1
- Seller Financing Addendum § 5
- Utah Code Title 57, Chapter 1
- All Inclusive Trust Deed (state-approved form, Oct. 1, 1983)
- All Inclusive Promissory Note Secured by All Inclusive Trust Deed (state-approved form, Oct. 1, 1983)
- Utah Admin. Code R162-2f-401f
- Utah Code § 57-3-102
- Utah Code § 57-3-103
- Utah Code § 57-1-21
- Utah Admin. Code R162-2f-401a(6)(d)